FirePro M4000 vs Quadro CX
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4000 and Quadro CX. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4000 and Quadro CX. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro CX
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | Quadro CX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 354% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1535 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro CX - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro CX is 2 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 2900 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 157% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 39% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 75% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 62% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 31% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 175% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | Quadro CX | |
| Architecture | GCN | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | GT200B |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |