FirePro M4150 vs Quadro CX
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4150 and Quadro CX. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4150 and Quadro CX. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro M4150
Quadro CX
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | Quadro CX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1535 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 113 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 2400 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
FirePro M4150 and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Fortnite is 20% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | Quadro CX | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Opal | GT200B |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 602 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Similar compares
- FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
- FirePro M4150 vs GeForce 830A
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
- Quadro CX vs GeForce 830A
- FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GT 645M
- FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics