FirePro M5950 vs Quadro CX
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M5950 and Quadro CX. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M5950 and Quadro CX. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro CX
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M5950 | Quadro CX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 328% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1535 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro CX - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5950 is 123 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro CX is 700 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Battlefield 5 is 71% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Dota 2 is 15% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Fortnite is 46% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Forza Horizon 4 is 75% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Grand Theft Auto V is 25% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
FirePro M5950 and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 120% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
FirePro M5950 | Quadro CX | |
Architecture | Terascale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Whistler-XT | GT200B |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 13 April 2011 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 480 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 602 MHz |
Transistor count | 716 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Bus support | n/a | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro M5950 vs GeForce 845M
- FirePro M5950 vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
- Quadro CX vs GeForce 845M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
- FirePro M5950 vs GeForce GT 645M
- FirePro M5950 vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics