FirePro S10000 vs Quadro CX

In this comparison between FirePro S10000 and Quadro CX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S10000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro CX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro S10000

Quadro CX

Main Specs

	FirePro S10000	Quadro CX
Power consumption (TDP)	750 Watt	150 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	1536 MB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

FirePro S10000 has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro CX.
FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro CX has 1530 GB more memory, than FirePro S10000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 223 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
FirePro S10000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
FirePro S10000 is 38 mm longer, than Quadro CX.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	1−2
ultra / 1080p	21−24	0−1
QHD / 1440p	16−18	0−1
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	10−12
medium / 1080p	40−45	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	55−60	−
ultra / 1080p	45−50	3−4
QHD / 1440p	35−40	0−1
4K / 2160p	18−20	−
low / 720p	100−110	12−14
medium / 1080p	60−65	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro S10000 and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	110−120
medium / 768p	220−230	85−90
ultra / 1080p	180−190	35−40
QHD / 1440p	110−120	−
4K / 2160p	70−75	10−11
high / 768p	210−220	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
FirePro S10000 and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	70−75
medium / 768p	110−120	45−50
ultra / 1080p	100−110	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 150% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	45−50	2−3
ultra / 1080p	40−45	2−3
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	14−16	0−1
low / 720p	80−85	10−11
medium / 1080p	45−50	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	60−65	−
ultra / 1080p	45−50	5−6
QHD / 1440p	27−30	1−2
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	45−50
medium / 1080p	110−120	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 526% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	60−65	3−4
ultra / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	30−35	0−1
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	14−16
medium / 1080p	65−70	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	140−150	40−45
medium / 768p	120−130	−
high / 1080p	70−75	3−4
ultra / 1080p	30−35	2−3
QHD / 1440p	21−24	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	24−27	1−2
ultra / 1080p	20−22	0−1
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
low / 720p	65−70	3−4
medium / 1080p	30−35	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	130−140	85−90
high / 1080p	−	55−60
medium / 1080p	120−130	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	100−110	24−27
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	3−4
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	4−5
medium / 1080p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	130−140	8−9
medium / 768p	85−90	7−8
high / 1080p	45−50	3−4
ultra / 1080p	24−27	3−4
4K / 2160p	16−18	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1360% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	90−95	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	50−55	12−14
high / 768p	60−65	30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Quadro CX.

Full Specs

	FirePro S10000	Quadro CX
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Tesla 2.0
Code name	Tahiti	GT200B
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	12 November 2012	11 November 2008
Pipelines	4096	192
Core clock speed	825 MHz	602 MHz
Boost Clock	950 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Texture fill rate	106.4	38.53
Floating-point performance	2x 3,405 gflops	462.3 gflops
Length	305 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	480 GB/s	76.8 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.1	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		1.3
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	383 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
Dual-link DVI support	+

FirePro S10000 vs Quadro CX

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares