FirePro S7150 vs Quadro CX
When comparing FirePro S7150 and Quadro CX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S7150 and Quadro CX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S7150
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro CX
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | Quadro CX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 150 Watt.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1528 GB more memory, than FirePro S7150.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 318 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- FirePro S7150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
- Quadro CX is 26 mm longer, than FirePro S7150.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S7150 and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro S7150 and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 150% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 526% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1360% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | Quadro CX | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Tonga | GT200B |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 602 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | 267 mm |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 1.3 | |