FirePro V7900 vs Quadro CX

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V7900 and Quadro CX, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V7900 stacks up against Quadro CX, check out specs charts below.

FirePro V7900 Check Price

Quadro CX

Main Specs

	FirePro V7900	Quadro CX
Power consumption (TDP)	151 Watt	150 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1536 MB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
	Check Price

FirePro V7900 has 0% more power consumption, than Quadro CX.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro CX has 1534 GB more memory, than FirePro V7900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro V7900 is 123 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
FirePro V7900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
FirePro V7900 is 12 mm longer, than Quadro CX.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V7900 is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−12	1−2
ultra / 1080p	6−7	0−1
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	10−12
medium / 1080p	14−16	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	3−4
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	12−14
medium / 1080p	20−22	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Battlefield 5 is 242% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	180−190	110−120
medium / 768p	150−160	85−90
ultra / 1080p	75−80	35−40
QHD / 1440p	45−50	−
4K / 2160p	30−33	10−11
high / 768p	110−120	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 80% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	30−33	14−16
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
FirePro V7900 and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	95−100	70−75
medium / 768p	80−85	45−50
ultra / 1080p	50−55	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Dota 2 is 67% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	12−14	2−3
ultra / 1080p	12−14	2−3
4K / 2160p	5−6	0−1
low / 720p	30−33	10−11
medium / 1080p	14−16	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	20−22	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	5−6
QHD / 1440p	−	1−2
low / 720p	80−85	45−50
medium / 1080p	35−40	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Fortnite is 125% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	18−20	3−4
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
QHD / 1440p	5−6	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	14−16
medium / 1080p	21−24	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	70−75	40−45
medium / 768p	60−65	−
high / 1080p	21−24	3−4
ultra / 1080p	9−10	2−3
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Grand Theft Auto V is 112% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	7−8	1−2
ultra / 1080p	5−6	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	3−4
medium / 1080p	9−10	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Metro Exodus is 550% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
high / 1080p	−	55−60
ultra / 1080p	90−95	−
medium / 1080p	100−105	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	20−22	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	45−50	24−27
medium / 1080p	21−24	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	8−9	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	4−5
medium / 1080p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 275% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	40−45	8−9
medium / 768p	24−27	7−8
high / 1080p	14−16	3−4
ultra / 1080p	8−9	3−4
4K / 2160p	7−8	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	95−100	70−75
medium / 768p	55−60	35−40
ultra / 1080p	27−30	12−14
high / 768p	45−50	30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Quadro CX.

Full Specs

	FirePro V7900	Quadro CX
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Tesla 2.0
Code name	Cayman	GT200B
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 May 2011	11 November 2008
Pipelines	1280	192
Core clock speed	725 MHz	602 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	55 nm
Texture fill rate	58.00	38.53
Floating-point performance	1,856.0 gflops	462.3 gflops
Length	279 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	76.8 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.0	4.0
OpenGL	4.4	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA		1.3
Bus support	PCIe 2.1 x16
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	171 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price

FirePro V7900 vs Quadro CX

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares