GeForce 825M vs Quadro CX
When choosing between GeForce 825M and Quadro CX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 825M and Quadro CX.
Quadro CX
GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 825M | Quadro CX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 354% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1534 GB more memory, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and Quadro CX - in Desktops.
- GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 248 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- GeForce 825M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 825M is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 450% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Dota 2 is 66% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Fortnite is 113% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| GeForce 825M and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| medium / 768p | − | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 825M | Quadro CX | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GK208 | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 January 2014 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.11 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 1.3 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |