GeForce GTX 485M vs Quadro CX
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 485M and Quadro CX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 485M will be the best choice, for others Quadro CX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro CX
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 485M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 485M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 485M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 485M | Quadro CX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- GeForce GTX 485M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1534 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- GeForce GTX 485M is used in Laptops, and Quadro CX - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 485M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro CX is 218 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- GeForce GTX 485M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro CX is 100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Battlefield 5 is 285% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 85% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 485M and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Dota 2 is 73% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Fortnite is 145% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Forza Horizon 4 is 262% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Metro Exodus is 550% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 360% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 485M | Quadro CX | |
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N12E-GTX-A1 | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 6 January 2010 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 384 | 602 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 36.8 billion/sec | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | 1.3 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Iris Graphics 550
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Quadro CX vs Iris Graphics 550
- Quadro CX vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
- GeForce GTX 485M vs GeForce GT 645M
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics