GeForce GTX 670M vs Quadro CX
When choosing between GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro CX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro CX.
Quadro CX
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670M | Quadro CX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 100% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1533 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is used in Laptops, and Quadro CX - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro CX is 4 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro CX is 100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Battlefield 5 is 157% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Dota 2 is 41% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Fortnite is 80% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Grand Theft Auto V is 62% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Minecraft is 31% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 175% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 30−33 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670M | Quadro CX | |
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N13E-GS1-LP | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 336 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 598 MHz | 602 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion/sec | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 803.7 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | 1.3 |
CUDA cores | 336 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 53 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 670M vs Radeon RX Vega 8
- GeForce GTX 670M vs FirePro W600
- Quadro CX vs Radeon RX Vega 8
- Quadro CX vs FirePro W600
- GeForce GTX 670M vs GeForce GT 645M
- GeForce GTX 670M vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics