GeForce MX150 vs Quadro CX
When comparing GeForce MX150 and Quadro CX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX150 and Quadro CX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro CX
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX150 | Quadro CX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 1400% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
- GeForce MX150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1532 GB more memory, than GeForce MX150.
- GeForce MX150 is used in Laptops, and Quadro CX - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX150 is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 866 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- GeForce MX150 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 4408 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Battlefield 5 is 285% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 85% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce MX150 and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Dota 2 is 73% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Fortnite is 140% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Metro Exodus is 550% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 360% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX150 | Quadro CX | |
Architecture | Pascal | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N17S-G1 | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 16 May 2017 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 1468 MHz | 602 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 6.1 | 1.3 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce MX150 vs Iris Graphics 540
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Quadro CX vs Iris Graphics 540
- Quadro CX vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- GeForce MX150 vs GeForce GT 645M
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics