GRID K260Q vs Quadro CX

When comparing GRID K260Q and Quadro CX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K260Q and Quadro CX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K260Q

Quadro CX

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Quadro CX
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	150 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1536 MB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

GRID K260Q has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro CX.
GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro CX has 1534 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 143 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	1−2
ultra / 1080p	9−10	0−1
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	10−12
medium / 1080p	18−20	2−3
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	21−24	3−4
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	12−14
medium / 1080p	27−30	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 385% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	210−220	110−120
medium / 768p	180−190	85−90
ultra / 1080p	95−100	35−40
QHD / 1440p	50−55	−
4K / 2160p	30−33	10−11
high / 768p	140−150	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 116% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	40−45	14−16
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	110−120	70−75
medium / 768p	90−95	45−50
ultra / 1080p	60−65	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 95% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	18−20	2−3
ultra / 1080p	16−18	2−3
4K / 2160p	6−7	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	10−11
medium / 1080p	18−20	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	5−6
QHD / 1440p	16−18	1−2
low / 720p	95−100	45−50
medium / 1080p	50−55	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 206% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	24−27	3−4
ultra / 1080p	20−22	−
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
low / 720p	50−55	14−16
medium / 1080p	27−30	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 337% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	85−90	40−45
medium / 768p	75−80	−
high / 1080p	30−33	3−4
ultra / 1080p	12−14	2−3
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 175% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	9−10	1−2
ultra / 1080p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	3−4
medium / 1080p	12−14	2−3
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 750% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	110−120	85−90
high / 1080p	−	55−60
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	21−24	14−16
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
low / 720p	55−60	24−27
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 82% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	4−5
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 375% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	55−60	8−9
medium / 768p	30−35	7−8
high / 1080p	18−20	3−4
ultra / 1080p	10−12	3−4
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	100−110	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	35−40	12−14
high / 768p	50−55	30−33
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 68% more, than Quadro CX.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Quadro CX
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla 2.0
Code name	GK104	GT200B
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	11 November 2008
Pipelines	1536	192
Core clock speed	745 MHz	602 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	38.53
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	462.3 gflops
Length		267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	76.8 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.1	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	3.0	1.3

GRID K260Q vs Quadro CX

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares