GRID M60 2Q vs Quadro CX

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID M60 2Q and Quadro CX, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID M60 2Q stacks up against Quadro CX, check out specs charts below.

GRID M60 2Q

Quadro CX

Main Specs

	GRID M60 2Q	Quadro CX
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	150 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1536 MB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

GRID M60 2Q has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro CX.
GRID M60 2Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro CX has 1534 GB more memory, than GRID M60 2Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID M60 2Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro CX is 45 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
GRID M60 2Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
Both graphics cards are the same length of 267 mm.
Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 3412 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	1−2
ultra / 1080p	21−24	0−1
QHD / 1440p	16−18	0−1
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	10−12
medium / 1080p	40−45	2−3
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	55−60	−
ultra / 1080p	45−50	3−4
QHD / 1440p	35−40	0−1
4K / 2160p	18−20	−
low / 720p	100−110	12−14
medium / 1080p	60−65	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID M60 2Q and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	110−120
medium / 768p	220−230	85−90
ultra / 1080p	180−190	35−40
QHD / 1440p	110−120	−
4K / 2160p	70−75	10−11
high / 768p	210−220	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
GRID M60 2Q and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	70−75
medium / 768p	110−120	45−50
ultra / 1080p	100−110	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 150% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	45−50	2−3
ultra / 1080p	40−45	2−3
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	14−16	0−1
low / 720p	80−85	10−11
medium / 1080p	45−50	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	60−65	−
ultra / 1080p	45−50	5−6
QHD / 1440p	27−30	1−2
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	45−50
medium / 1080p	110−120	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 526% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	60−65	3−4
ultra / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	30−35	0−1
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	14−16
medium / 1080p	65−70	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	140−150	40−45
medium / 768p	120−130	−
high / 1080p	70−75	3−4
ultra / 1080p	30−35	2−3
QHD / 1440p	21−24	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	24−27	1−2
ultra / 1080p	20−22	0−1
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
low / 720p	65−70	3−4
medium / 1080p	30−35	2−3
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	130−140	85−90
high / 1080p	−	55−60
medium / 1080p	120−130	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	100−110	24−27
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	3−4
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	4−5
medium / 1080p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	130−140	8−9
medium / 768p	85−90	7−8
high / 1080p	45−50	3−4
ultra / 1080p	24−27	3−4
4K / 2160p	16−18	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1360% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	90−95	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	50−55	12−14
high / 768p	60−65	30−33
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Quadro CX.

Full Specs

	GRID M60 2Q	Quadro CX
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Code name	GM204	GT200B
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	30 August 2015	11 November 2008
Pipelines	2048	192
Core clock speed	557 MHz	602 MHz
Boost Clock	1178 MHz
Transistor count	5,200 million	1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Texture fill rate	150.8	38.53
Floating-point performance	4,833 gflops	462.3 gflops
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.4 GB/s	76.8 GB/s
DirectX	12 (12_1)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	6.4	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	5.2	1.3

GRID M60 2Q vs Quadro CX

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares