Iris Graphics 550 vs Quadro CX
In this comparison between Iris Graphics 550 and Quadro CX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Graphics 550 will be the best choice, for others Quadro CX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro CX
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Graphics 550 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 550 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 550 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 550 | Quadro CX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 550.
- Iris Graphics 550 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1472 GB more memory, than Iris Graphics 550.
- Iris Graphics 550 is used in Laptops, and Quadro CX - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 550 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro CX is 302 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 550.
- Iris Graphics 550 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 180% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Battlefield 5 is 185% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Fortnite is 95% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Grand Theft Auto V is 87% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Minecraft is 40% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 550 | Quadro CX | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT3e | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 48 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 602 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Graphics 550 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Iris Graphics 550 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Graphics 550 vs GeForce GT 645M
- Iris Graphics 550 vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics