Quadro 3000M vs Quadro CX
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro 3000M and Quadro CX, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro 3000M stacks up against Quadro CX, check out specs charts below.
Quadro CX
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 3000M | Quadro CX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1534 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro CX - in Desktops.
- Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro CX is 152 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro CX is 975 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Quadro 3000M and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Fortnite is 20% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
Quadro 3000M | Quadro CX | |
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Fermi | GT200B |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 240 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 602 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.00 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 625 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | 1.3 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro 3000M vs Radeon R9 A375
- Quadro 3000M vs Iris Graphics 5100
- Quadro CX vs Radeon R9 A375
- Quadro CX vs Iris Graphics 5100
- Quadro 3000M vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro 3000M vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics