Quadro CX vs Quadro K1100M
In this comparison between Quadro CX and Quadro K1100M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro CX will be the best choice, for others Quadro K1100M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro CX
Quadro K1100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro CX | Quadro K1100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 233% more power consumption, than Quadro K1100M.
- Quadro CX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K1100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro CX has 1534 GB more memory, than Quadro K1100M.
- Quadro CX is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1100M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K1100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K1100M is 103 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K1100M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K1100M is 1200 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| Quadro CX and Quadro K1100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Quadro CX and Quadro K1100M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Fortnite is 20% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Minecraft is 11% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Quadro CX and Quadro K1100M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| medium / 768p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro CX | Quadro K1100M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GT200B | GK107 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 705 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 22.59 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 542.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 44.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |