Quadro CX vs Quadro M1200
When choosing between Quadro CX and Quadro M1200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro CX and Quadro M1200.
Quadro CX
Quadro M1200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro CX | Quadro M1200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 233% more power consumption, than Quadro M1200.
- Quadro CX has 1532 GB more memory, than Quadro M1200.
- Quadro CX is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1200 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M1200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1200 is 389 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M1200 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1200 is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Battlefield 5 is 471% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro CX and Quadro M1200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 75−80 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 138% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Dota 2 is 115% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Fortnite is 266% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 450% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 475% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 620% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro CX | Quadro M1200 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GT200B | N17P-Q1 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 991 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1870 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |