Quadro CX vs Quadro M2000M
In this comparison between Quadro CX and Quadro M2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro CX will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro CX
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro CX | Quadro M2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 172% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- Quadro CX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro CX has 1532 GB more memory, than Quadro M2000M.
- Quadro CX is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 436 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 471% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 135% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 115% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 266% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 450% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 475% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 620% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro CX | Quadro M2000M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GT200B | GM107 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 43.92 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | 5.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |