Quadro CX vs Quadro M600M
In this comparison between Quadro CX and Quadro M600M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro CX will be the best choice, for others Quadro M600M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro CX
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M600M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M600M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M600M here:
Main Specs
Quadro CX | Quadro M600M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro M600M.
- Quadro CX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M600M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro CX has 1534 GB more memory, than Quadro M600M.
- Quadro CX is used in Desktops, and Quadro M600M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M600M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M600M is 235 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M600M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M600M is 3412 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Battlefield 5 is 228% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Dota 2 is 60% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Fortnite is 115% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Forza Horizon 4 is 225% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 320% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in World of Tanks is 44% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
Quadro CX | Quadro M600M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GT200B | GM107 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 837 MHz |
Boost Clock | 876 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 14.02 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 1.3 | 5.0 |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro M600M vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro M600M vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
- Quadro CX vs GeForce MX130
- Quadro M600M vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
- Quadro M600M vs GeForce MX130