Quadro CX vs Qualcomm Adreno 680
When comparing Quadro CX and Qualcomm Adreno 680, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro CX and Qualcomm Adreno 680 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro CX
Qualcomm Adreno 680 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Qualcomm Adreno 680 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Qualcomm Adreno 680 here:
Main Specs
Quadro CX | Qualcomm Adreno 680 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Quadro CX is used in Desktops, and Qualcomm Adreno 680 - in Laptops.
- Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Qualcomm Adreno 680 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1000% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro CX and Qualcomm Adreno 680 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Quadro CX and Qualcomm Adreno 680 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Fortnite is 113% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Minecraft is 35% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | − |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680. |
Full Specs
Quadro CX | Qualcomm Adreno 680 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | |
Code name | GT200B | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 6 December 2018 |
Pipelines | 192 | |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs GeForce GT 645M
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GRID K140Q
- Quadro CX vs GeForce 720A
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs GRID K140Q
- Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs GeForce 720A