Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 4810
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro CX and Radeon HD 4810, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro CX stacks up against Radeon HD 4810, check out specs charts below.
Quadro CX
Radeon HD 4810
Main Specs
Quadro CX | Radeon HD 4810 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 95 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
- Quadro CX has 57% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 4810.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro CX has 1024 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 4810.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 4810 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4810 is 23 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- Quadro CX and Radeon HD 4810 are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
- Quadro CX is 21 mm longer, than Radeon HD 4810.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 4810 is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1000% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro CX and Radeon HD 4810 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Quadro CX and Radeon HD 4810 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Fortnite is 113% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Minecraft is 35% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | − |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Radeon HD 4810. |
Full Specs
Quadro CX | Radeon HD 4810 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GT200B | RV770 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 28 May 2009 |
Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 625 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 20.00 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | 246 mm |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Similar compares
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon HD 4810 vs GeForce GT 645M
- Radeon HD 4810 vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce 920M
- Quadro CX vs GeForce 9800 GTX
- Radeon HD 4810 vs GeForce 920M
- Radeon HD 4810 vs GeForce 9800 GTX