Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
In this comparison between Quadro CX and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro CX will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro CX
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
Quadro CX | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2x2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 1534 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
- Quadro CX is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - in Laptops.
- Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is 78 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro CX is 700 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 500% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Battlefield 5 is 557% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro CX and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 95−100 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 154% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Dota 2 is 126% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Fortnite is 300% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Forza Horizon 4 is 525% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Metro Exodus is 1100% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 550% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 720% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
Quadro CX | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Terascale 2 |
Code name | GT200B | Blackcomb XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 192 | 1920 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 680 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2x1700 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce GT 645M
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Quadro CX vs FirePro S9050
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs FirePro S9050