Quadro CX vs Radeon Pro 460
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro CX and Radeon Pro 460, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro CX stacks up against Radeon Pro 460, check out specs charts below.
Quadro CX
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
Quadro CX | Radeon Pro 460 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 328% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Quadro CX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1532 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Quadro CX is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 298 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 471% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 110% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 253% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 425% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 600% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
Quadro CX | Radeon Pro 460 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GT200B | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 8 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 192 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 907 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 58.05 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce GT 645M
- Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs FirePro W8000
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GTX 750
- Radeon Pro 460 vs FirePro W8000
- Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce GTX 750