Quadro CX vs Radeon Pro 5300M
In this comparison between Quadro CX and Radeon Pro 5300M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro CX will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 5300M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro CX
Radeon Pro 5300M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5300M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5300M here:
Main Specs
Quadro CX | Radeon Pro 5300M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 76% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
- Quadro CX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 5300M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1532 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
- Quadro CX is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 5300M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 5300M - with Navi / RDNA.
- Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 5300M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5300M is 10400 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro CX and Radeon Pro 5300M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
Quadro CX and Radeon Pro 5300M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Dota 2 is 150% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Fortnite is 526% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 8−9 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1360% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
Quadro CX | Radeon Pro 5300M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Navi / RDNA |
Code name | GT200B | Navi 14 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 13 November 2019 |
Pipelines | 192 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 100.0 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon Pro 5300M vs GeForce GT 645M
- Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs Quadro M3000M
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GTX 1050
- Radeon Pro 5300M vs Quadro M3000M
- Radeon Pro 5300M vs GeForce GTX 1050