Quadro CX vs Radeon Pro 560
When choosing between Quadro CX and Radeon Pro 560, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro CX and Radeon Pro 560.
Quadro CX
Radeon Pro 560 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro CX | Radeon Pro 560 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560.
- Quadro CX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1532 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 560.
- Quadro CX is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 560 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 305 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 3480 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Battlefield 5 is 471% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Dota 2 is 110% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Fortnite is 253% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Forza Horizon 4 is 425% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 620% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro CX | Radeon Pro 560 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GT200B | Polaris 21 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 5 June 2017 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 907 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 58.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |