Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro CX vs Radeon R7 A265

    If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro CX and Radeon R7 A265, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro CX stacks up against Radeon R7 A265, check out specs charts below.
    Quadro CX
    Radeon R7 A265

    Main Specs

      Quadro CX Radeon R7 A265
    Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt
    Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
    Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin
    Memory type GDDR3 DDR3
    Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 2 GB
    Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video No outputs
     
    • Quadro CX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 A265 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
    • Quadro CX has 1534 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A265.
    • Both cards are used in Desktops.
    • Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
    • Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A265 is 123 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
    • Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A265 - by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 A265 is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 1−2 1−2
    ultra / 1080p 0−1 0−1
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
    low / 720p 10−12 12−14
    medium / 1080p 2−3 3−4
    The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro CX.

    Full Specs

      Quadro CX Radeon R7 A265
    Architecture Tesla 2.0 GCN 1.0
    Code name GT200B Opal
    Type Workstation Desktop
    Release date 11 November 2008 9 January 2014
    Pipelines 192 384
    Core clock speed 602 MHz 725 MHz
    Boost Clock 825 MHz
    Transistor count 1,400 million 950 million
    Manufacturing process technology 55 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 38.53 19.80
    Floating-point performance 462.3 gflops 633.6 gflops
    Length 267 mm
    Memory bus width 384 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 1800 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 76.8 GB/s 28.8 GB/s
    DirectX 11.1 (10_0) 12 (11_1)
    Shader Model 4.0 5.1
    OpenGL 3.3 4.6
    OpenCL 1.1 1.2
    Vulkan N/A 1.2.131
    CUDA 1.3
     

    Similar compares