Quadro CX vs Radeon R7 M270
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro CX and Radeon R7 M270. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro CX and Radeon R7 M270. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro CX
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro CX | Radeon R7 M270 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | Not Listed |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro CX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro CX is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M270 - in Laptops.
- Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M270 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270 is 223 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1000% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro CX and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Quadro CX and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Fortnite is 113% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Minecraft is 35% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 7−8 | − |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro CX | Radeon R7 M270 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GT200B | Opal XT / Mars |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 7 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |