Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro CX vs Radeon R7 M270DX

    Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro CX and Radeon R7 M270DX. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro CX and Radeon R7 M270DX. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
    Quadro CX
    Radeon R7 M270DX

    Main Specs

      Quadro CX Radeon R7 M270DX
    Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt
    Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 IGP
    Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin
    Memory type GDDR3 System Shared
    Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB
    Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video No outputs
     
    • Quadro CX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
    • Both cards are used in Desktops.
    • Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
    • Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 298 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
    • Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270DX - by 28 nm process technology.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 1−2 2−3
    ultra / 1080p 0−1 0−1
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
    low / 720p 10−12 12−14
    medium / 1080p 2−3 3−4
    The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro CX.

    Full Specs

      Quadro CX Radeon R7 M270DX
    Architecture Tesla 2.0 GCN 3.0
    Code name GT200B Topaz
    Type Workstation Desktop
    Release date 11 November 2008 11 June 2014
    Pipelines 192 384
    Core clock speed 602 MHz 900 MHz
    Boost Clock 940 MHz
    Transistor count 1,400 million 1,550 million
    Manufacturing process technology 55 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 38.53 22.56
    Floating-point performance 462.3 gflops
    Length 267 mm
    Memory bus width 384 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1600 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 76.8 GB/s
    DirectX 11.1 (10_0) 12 (12_0)
    Shader Model 4.0 6.3
    OpenGL 3.3 4.6
    OpenCL 1.1 2.0
    Vulkan N/A 1.2.131
    CUDA 1.3
     

    Similar compares