Quadro CX vs Radeon R9 270X

In this comparison between Quadro CX and Radeon R9 270X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro CX will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 270X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Main Specs

  Quadro CX Radeon R9 270X
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 180 Watt
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin 2 x 6-pin
Memory type GDDR3 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 2 GB
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
  Check Price
  • Radeon R9 270X has 20% more power consumption, than Quadro CX.
  • Quadro CX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
  • Quadro CX has 1534 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 270X.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 270X - with GCN.
  • Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 270X - by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 1−2 24−27
ultra / 1080p 0−1 14−16
QHD / 1440p 0−1 10−11
4K / 2160p 6−7
low / 720p 10−12 45−50
medium / 1080p 2−3 30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 600% more, than Quadro CX.

Full Specs

  Quadro CX Radeon R9 270X
Architecture Tesla 2.0 GCN
Code name GT200B Curacao XT
Type Workstation Desktop
Release date 11 November 2008 8 October 2013
Pipelines 192 1280
Core clock speed 602 MHz
Boost Clock 1050 MHz
Transistor count 1,400 million 2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology 55 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 38.53 84.00
Floating-point performance 462.3 gflops 2,688 gflops
Length 267 mm
Memory bus width 384 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth 76.8 GB/s 179.2 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model 4.0 5.1
OpenGL 3.3 4.6
OpenCL 1.1 1.2
Vulkan N/A +
CUDA 1.3
FreeSync +
Bus support PCIe 3.0
HDMI +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 318 Mh/s
Eyefinity +
HD3D +
TrueAudio +
Design reference
DisplayPort support +
CrossFire +
DDMA audio +
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 30 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 163 Sol/s
AppAcceleration +
LiquidVR +
TressFX +
UVD +
  Check Price