Quadro CX vs Radeon R9 M385X
In this comparison between Quadro CX and Radeon R9 M385X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro CX will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M385X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro CX
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 M385X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385X here:
Main Specs
Quadro CX | Radeon R9 M385X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro CX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M385X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1532 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M385X.
- Quadro CX is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385X - in Laptops.
- Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M385X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M385X is 498 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M385X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro CX is 100 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Battlefield 5 is 171% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Dota 2 is 41% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Fortnite is 80% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Minecraft is 34% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 175% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
Quadro CX | Radeon R9 M385X | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GT200B | Strato-XT-M3 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 16 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 192 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,080 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 61.60 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 M385X vs GeForce GT 645M
- Radeon R9 M385X vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs FirePro M6000
- Quadro CX vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Radeon R9 M385X vs FirePro M6000
- Radeon R9 M385X vs Iris Plus Graphics 650