Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro CX vs Radeon R9 M395

    When comparing Quadro CX and Radeon R9 M395, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro CX and Radeon R9 M395 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    Quadro CX
    Radeon R9 M395 Check Price

    Radeon R9 M395 is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Radeon R9 M395 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395 here:

    Radeon R9 M395 Laptops

    Main Specs

      Quadro CX Radeon R9 M395
    Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt
    Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin
    Memory type GDDR3 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 4 GB
    Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
      Check Price
    • Quadro CX has 1532 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M395.
    • Quadro CX is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395 - in Laptops.
    • Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M395 - with GCN.
    • Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M395 is 232 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
    • Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M395 - by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro CX is 350 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 1−2 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 0−1 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 16−18
    4K / 2160p − 10−11
    low / 720p 10−12 60−65
    medium / 1080p 2−3 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than Quadro CX.

    Full Specs

      Quadro CX Radeon R9 M395
    Architecture Tesla 2.0 GCN
    Code name GT200B
    Type Workstation Laptop
    Release date 11 November 2008 9 June 2015
    Pipelines 192 1792
    Core clock speed 602 MHz 834 MHz
    Transistor count 1,400 million 5000 Million
    Manufacturing process technology 55 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 38.53
    Floating-point performance 462.3 gflops
    Length 267 mm
    Memory bus width 384 Bit 256 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 1250 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 76.8 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 11.1 (10_0)
    Shader Model 4.0
    OpenGL 3.3 4.4
    OpenCL 1.1 Not Listed
    Vulkan N/A +
    CUDA 1.3
    FreeSync +
    Bus support PCIe 3.0
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 336 Mh/s
    Laptop size large
    Eyefinity +
    HD3D +
    PowerTune +
    DualGraphics +
    TrueAudio +
    ZeroCore +
    Switchable graphics +
    Mantle +
      Check Price

    Similar compares