Quadro CX vs Tesla M60
When choosing between Quadro CX and Tesla M60, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro CX and Tesla M60.
Quadro CX
Tesla M60
Main Specs
| Quadro CX | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
- Tesla M60 has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro CX.
- Quadro CX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1528 GB more memory, than Tesla M60.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro CX is 45 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Both graphics cards are the same length of 267 mm.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 3412 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 880% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 1014% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro CX and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| Quadro CX and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 150% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 1350% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 553% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 937% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 431% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 2150% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1000% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 8−9 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 7−8 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1400% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 70% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro CX | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GT200B | GM204 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | 5.2 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |