FirePro W4190M vs Quadro FX 3800
When comparing FirePro W4190M and Quadro FX 3800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W4190M and Quadro FX 3800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 3800
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W4190M has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 225 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 2400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Battlefield 5 is 175% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Dota 2 is 31% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Fortnite is 56% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Grand Theft Auto V is 39% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Minecraft is 10% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | GT200B |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |