FirePro W7170M vs Quadro FX 3800
When choosing between FirePro W7170M and Quadro FX 3800, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W7170M and Quadro FX 3800.
Quadro FX 3800
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7170M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 108 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 8% more power consumption, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W7170M has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 123 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- FirePro W7170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 1000% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W7170M and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 178% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 148% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 1033% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 326% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 650% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 284% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 3600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1750% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1533% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 85% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7170M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Architecture | GCN 3 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Tonga | GT200B |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 30 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 600 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 38.40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |