FireStream 9270 vs Quadro FX 3800
In this comparison between FireStream 9270 and Quadro FX 3800 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9270 will be the best choice, for others Quadro FX 3800 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9270
Quadro FX 3800
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
- FireStream 9270 has 48% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FireStream 9270 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 150 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- FireStream 9270 and Quadro FX 3800 are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 250% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 39% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 266% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Fortnite is 65% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 60% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Metro Exodus is 900% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 5% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 33% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 366% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | RV770 | GT200B |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |