GeForce 920M vs Quadro FX 3800
When choosing between GeForce 920M and Quadro FX 3800, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 920M and Quadro FX 3800.
Quadro FX 3800
GeForce 920M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 227% more power consumption, than GeForce 920M.
- GeForce 920M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 920M has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce 920M is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920M is 354 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce 920M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 920M is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 900% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 920M and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 135% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce 920M and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Dota 2 is 89% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Fortnite is 90% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 175% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in World of Tanks is 68% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | N16V-GM-S | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 January 2015 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 1.3 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 40 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |