GeForce GT 750M vs Quadro FX 3800
In this comparison between GeForce GT 750M and Quadro FX 3800 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 750M will be the best choice, for others Quadro FX 3800 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 3800
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 750M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 116% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 750M.
- GeForce GT 750M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GT 750M has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GT 750M is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 367 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GT 750M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Battlefield 5 is 275% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Dota 2 is 39% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Far Cry 5 is 266% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Fortnite is 73% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Grand Theft Auto V is 60% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Metro Exodus is 900% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Minecraft is 5% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 33% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 366% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 750M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | N14P-GT | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 April 2013 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 967 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.94 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 1.3 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |