GeForce GT 755M vs Quadro FX 3800
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GT 755M and Quadro FX 3800, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GT 755M stacks up against Quadro FX 3800, check out specs charts below.
Quadro FX 3800
GeForce GT 755M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 755M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 108 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 116% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M.
- GeForce GT 755M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GT 755M has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GT 755M is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 755M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 380 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 3800 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Battlefield 5 is 350% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Dota 2 is 51% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Far Cry 5 is 366% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Fortnite is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Grand Theft Auto V is 89% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Metro Exodus is 1400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Minecraft is 35% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 650% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 533% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in World of Tanks is 41% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 755M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N14P- | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 25 June 2013 | 30 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 600 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.36 | 38.40 |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 1.3 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |