GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs Quadro FX 3800
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB and Quadro FX 3800 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB will be the best choice, for others Quadro FX 3800 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
Quadro FX 3800
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 108 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
- GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB has 11% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is 906 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is 52 mm longer, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is 6408 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 483% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Battlefield 5 is 1050% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | − |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 187% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Dota 2 is 160% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Far Cry 5 is 1133% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Fortnite is 339% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Forza Horizon 4 is 733% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Grand Theft Auto V is 284% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Metro Exodus is 4100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2000% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 4−5 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1666% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in World of Tanks is 85% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Architecture | Pascal | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GP106 | GT200B |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 26 December 2017 | 30 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1709 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 136.7 | 38.40 |
Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 250 mm | 198 mm |
Memory bus width | 160 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.2 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 6.1 | 1.3 |