GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs Quadro FX 3800
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and Quadro FX 3800, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 1650 mobile stacks up against Quadro FX 3800, check out specs charts below.
Quadro FX 3800
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 108 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 116% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 795 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 6400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Dota 2 is 180% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 1866% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Fortnite is 552% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 1200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 468% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Metro Exodus is 6600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3250% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 4−5 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2933% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in World of Tanks is 97% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Architecture | Turing | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N18P-G0, N18P-G61 | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 23 April 2019 | 30 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 99.84 | 38.40 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | N/A |
CUDA | 7.5 | 1.3 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs FirePro W8100
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- Quadro FX 3800 vs FirePro W8100
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs GeForce GT 440
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs Quadro K600
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GeForce GT 440
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro K600