GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Quadro FX 3800
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Quadro FX 3800. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Quadro FX 3800. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Quadro FX 3800
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 44% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 930 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 31 mm longer, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 6400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 850% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 20−22 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 1850% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 250% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 180% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 2033% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 190−200 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 595% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 1316% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 484% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 7600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3500% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 3166% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | − | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 89% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Turing | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | GT200B |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | no data | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 229 mm | 198 mm |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 12_1 | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |