GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Quadro FX 3800
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Quadro FX 3800 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro FX 3800 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 3800
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 108 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 116% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 435 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 8400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 180% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 1866% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 552% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 1200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 468% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 6600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3250% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 4−5 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2933% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 97% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Architecture | Turing | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N18P-G62 Max-Q | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 April 2020 | 30 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.80 | 38.40 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | N/A |
CUDA | 7.5 | 1.3 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GT 440
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Quadro K600
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GeForce GT 440
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro K600