GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro FX 3800
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro FX 3800. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro FX 3800. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Quadro FX 3800
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 38% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro FX 3800 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 700 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Quadro FX 3800 is 190 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 100 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 70% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 433% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 126% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 1800% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 850% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 733% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GF104 | GT200B |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | 198 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 1.3 |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |