GeForce GTX 560M vs Quadro FX 3800
When comparing GeForce GTX 560M and Quadro FX 3800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 560M and Quadro FX 3800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 3800
GeForce GTX 560M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 560M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 560M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 44% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 560M.
- GeForce GTX 560M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 560M has 1535 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 560M is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 560M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 560M is 175 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 560M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 350 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Battlefield 5 is 250% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Dota 2 is 39% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Far Cry 5 is 233% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Fortnite is 65% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Grand Theft Auto V is 60% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Metro Exodus is 900% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Minecraft is 5% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 333% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 560M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | N12E-GS | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 May 2011 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.8 billion/sec | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 1.3 |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| 3D Gaming | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |