GeForce GTX 670MX vs Quadro FX 3800
When comparing GeForce GTX 670MX and Quadro FX 3800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 670MX and Quadro FX 3800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 3800
GeForce GTX 670MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670MX | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 108 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 44% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 670MX has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Dota 2 is 58% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Fortnite is 126% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Metro Exodus is 1600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Minecraft is 38% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 750% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670MX | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N13E-GR | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 October 2012 | 30 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 960 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 600 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion/sec | 38.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 67.2 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 1.3 |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |