GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Quadro FX 3800
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Quadro FX 3800 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 765M SLI will be the best choice, for others Quadro FX 3800 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 3800
GeForce GTX 765M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 765M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 765M SLI | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI has 20% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M SLI is 250 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M SLI is 2400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 900% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 80−85 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 169% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Dota 2 is 141% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 1000% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Fortnite is 295% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 650% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 268% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Metro Exodus is 3600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 106% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1750% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1533% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in World of Tanks is 85% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 765M SLI | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GT200B | |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 May 2013 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2x 2540 Million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | 1.3 |
| SLI options | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon RX 560 mobile
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon RX 560 mobile
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs GeForce GT 440
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Quadro K600
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GeForce GT 440
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro K600