GeForce GTX 775M vs Quadro FX 3800
When comparing GeForce GTX 775M and Quadro FX 3800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 775M and Quadro FX 3800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 3800
GeForce GTX 775M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 775M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 775M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 775M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 108 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 8% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 775M.
- GeForce GTX 775M has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 775M is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 775M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 775M is 119 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 775M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 775M is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 483% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Battlefield 5 is 1075% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 775M and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | − |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 189% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Dota 2 is 160% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Far Cry 5 is 1166% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Fortnite is 360% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Forza Horizon 4 is 733% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Grand Theft Auto V is 284% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Metro Exodus is 4100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2000% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 4−5 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1733% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in World of Tanks is 85% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 775M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N13E-GTX-A2 | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 24 September 2013 | 30 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 1344 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 719 MHz | 600 MHz |
Transistor count | 3540 Million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.40 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | 1.3 |
SLI options | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |