GeForce GTX 860M vs Quadro FX 3800
When choosing between GeForce GTX 860M and Quadro FX 3800, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 860M and Quadro FX 3800.
Quadro FX 3800
GeForce GTX 860M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 860M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 108 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 44% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 860M.
- GeForce GTX 860M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 860M has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 860M is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 860M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M is 197 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 860M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 350% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Battlefield 5 is 825% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 158% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 100−105 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Far Cry 5 is 833% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Fortnite is 252% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Metro Exodus is 3100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 106% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1500% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1300% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in World of Tanks is 91% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 860M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N15P-GX | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 30 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 640 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 915 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.40 | 38.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 1.3 |
CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |