GeForce MX150 vs Quadro FX 3800
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce MX150 and Quadro FX 3800. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce MX150 and Quadro FX 3800. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 3800
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX150 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 980% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
- GeForce MX150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX150 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce MX150 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX150 is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 868 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce MX150 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 4408 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Battlefield 5 is 575% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Dota 2 is 95% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Far Cry 5 is 566% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Fortnite is 182% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 366% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 147% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Metro Exodus is 2100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 68% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1000% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 833% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX150 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | N17S-G1 | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 May 2017 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1468 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 1.3 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |