GeForce MX250 vs Quadro FX 3800
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce MX250 and Quadro FX 3800. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce MX250 and Quadro FX 3800. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 3800
GeForce MX250 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX250 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX250 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 980% more power consumption, than GeForce MX250.
- GeForce MX250 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x4, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX250 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce MX250 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX250 is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 918 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce MX250 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 5400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Battlefield 5 is 625% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 118% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Far Cry 5 is 666% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Fortnite is 204% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 416% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 168% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Metro Exodus is 2400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1150% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 966% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX250 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | N17S-G2 | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 20 February 2019 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1518 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 1.3 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |