GRID K220Q vs Quadro FX 3800
When comparing GRID K220Q and Quadro FX 3800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K220Q and Quadro FX 3800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K220Q
Quadro FX 3800
Main Specs
| GRID K220Q | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
- GRID K220Q has 108% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GRID K220Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K220Q has 511 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K220Q is 145 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GRID K220Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| GRID K220Q and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K220Q and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Fortnite is 17% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Minecraft is 2% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | − |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K220Q | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | GT200B |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 July 2014 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 1.3 |